Discussion Questions

Running head : NO ! NO ! NOIt s a No ! No ! NoName of the StudentUniversity /SchoolName of InstructorCourse /SubjectIt s a No ! No ! No fond protection arranging has been farsighted established by the disposal to meet the inescapably of the populace for an insured intent . aside from that the principal(prenominal) employment of the program is mandated by the tender Rights and Freedom to take aim more than or little a beneficial life finished savings and other(a) related programs . This provides each somebody a profound manage protection over unhoped and expected mint much(prenominal) as aging , invalidness job littleness and the like . by from that , it is the trade of the state and the federal governance to insure a grave life to its populace (International cordial security system acquaintance , 2008A new-fashioned ply has just been arisen later the proclamation of chairman George W . Bush about the national on the ratification in the privatization of the Social Security frame . He says that it is separate thusly to invest the earnings of the dope to the stock grocery than macrocosm kept in the political science treasury (Smith ,H , 2001 . The realistic lay down is that privatization is one among the key methods of the federal sate to append the stocks and the investments of the demesne . It is evident that there is a fluctuating serial in the stock rates of the artless and among the federal governments agency of stabilise the stock market is to subjoin the investment bowlful a semi privatization of the genial surety . A nonher conundrum is the presumption on the usefulness and take if one has invested in the semi-privatized social protection . Will it regaining a senior eminent profit or a low profit ? It was not really answered clearly by the federal government .

In this view only those who be well-to-do have the sand to have insurance to the social security which beats the master(prenominal) goal of the program- to insure a stable monetary full of the massesLooking at the caricature of the privatization amendment gives a less opportunity for the concourse to have their savings . As I can fit more or less the semi-privatization proposed by the president testament later move to a full privatized social security system aiming as an income author to the government and not as a program of financial assurance to the masses . In effect only those who ar well-off have the cognitive content to gain profit on the system . and then , my sales booth to the issue is a No ! No ! No ! to semi-privatization of the Social Security SystemReferencesInternational Social Security acquaintance (2008 . About Social Security ISSA : Promoting andDeveloping Social Security world(a) . Retrieved fromhypertext transfer protocol / entanglement .issa .int /aiss /s /About-social-securitySmith , H (October 2001 . What Would progress if We Privatized Social Security . Human QuestNET avocation Network . Retrieved fromHYPERLINK http /findarticles .com /p /articles /mi_qa3861 /is_200109 /ai_n8960081 /pg_2 ?tag artBody c http /findarticles .com /p /articles /mi_qa3861 /is_200109 /ai_n8960081 /pg_2 tag artBody col1It s a No ! PAGE MERGEFORMAT 2...If you trust to find a full essay, aim it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper