Compare Adn Contrast The Vocation Of Socrates As A Philosopher To That Of The Hebrew Prophets

Running Head : SOCRATES AND THE HEBREW PROPHETSSocrates of the Hebraic ProphetsByMACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Names of take in (s )]MACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Course Identification information here]MACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Professors name here]MACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Submission forecast to it here]Socrates and the Hebraical ProphetsNormative ethics , as James Rachels conceives of it , is the attempt to prescribe which actions atomic number 18 even up and which actions are wrong (Rachels 1998 ,.vii . In this circumstance view , it may so be reasonred that normative honourable theories are anchored on the effect of the right thither is , notwithstanding , another notion that logically takes priority oer the notion of the right and this is the notion of the unafraid . Logically harangue , peerless is warrant ed to say that the notion of the good serves as a essential condition for the notion of the right . Elucidating it further , the undercoat for determine whether an action is right or wrong dep expirys on what our rendering of the good is . It is ultimately , the definition of the good that determines what actions are right and what actions are wrongThis seeks to explicate the main similarities and differences between Socrates pattern of the good in opposition to that of the Hebrew prophets . I bequeath betoken that the main difference between the two lies in their conception of morality . This is based on the assumption that twain Socrates and the Hebrew prophets believed in the promotion of morality and justice in the foundation . The difference between them may be traced to the delegacy in which they sought to establish the same endsLike the Hebrew prophets , Socrates claims that he must do God s work for the benefit of his chap Athenians (Colaiaco , 2001 ,.71 . Socra tes , in this sense , perceived himself as G! od s missioner the same way that the Hebrew prophets did .

However , like the Hebrew prophets who chose to question the beliefs of the highest authorities , both Socrates and the Hebrew prophets came to a notional end . Both of them may be seen as presenting an antithesis to the overabundant perspectives which were herald during their timeSocrates view regarding morality and justice may be summed up with his notion of the good brio . From his statement , The unexamined life is not worth living , one may and then , infer that the statement in itself provides us with an estimation of the measure out or worth o f life . This is to say that eudaimonia [in wishing of a more appropriate English term happiness] entails not scarce the pursuit of desires such as physical pleasures alone in addition [and more importantly] intellectual pleasures . There is thus , a take aim to develop our own near human function or excellence that is , our rational depicted object . In Socrates views , it is only done the passment of eudemonia that individuals within the physical estate may attain mastery of their desires as well as knowledgeIn contrast to this , strike off for example the manner in which morality and justice is ensured in one of Hebrew prophets...If you command to get a skillful essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper