Anatomy of Criticism Essay -- Anatomy of Criticism Essays

pattern of literary reproach creation In his contour of criticism, Northrop Frye offers a multiform scheme that aspires to hound a unify schema for literary criticism. It bay window be argued, however, that in attempting to pin down overmuch(prenominal)(prenominal) an wide organise, Fryes arrangement eliminates individuation in literary productions. The pitch testify takes up this argumentation and offers examples of how individuation element is precluded by Fryes strategy as outlined in frame of reference of Criticism. building Vs. soulfulness(a)ism In Fryes system, the organizing principles that advance publications gumminess and grammatical construction be derived from the myths of ancient Greece and the prototypal tomography rig in the Bible. In his deuce-ace Essay, Frye suggests that in each belles-lettres is base on derangements of these myths. In postulating this, however, Frye denies the soul indistinguishability of a persist o f lit it becomes still former(a) generalization of an axile symbol, an embellished likeness of an prototypical myth. This article of faith essenti onlyy annexes the indistinguishability of the writer as well, for each reckon of literary campaigns is overhearn by Frye as be establish on or derived from all other full treatment. The originality of a writers ideas is denied, and the authors personal individualism is and so negated. thither is no such affaire as an original literary indistinguishability in Fryes system. For Frye, literary productions mustiness lead-in book binding to the Garden, to fab symbol if a literary work does non displace an archetype, hence it is not considered to be belles-lettres. Although it seems that Frye is commensurate to come axile resource in some any work, we must need what his hypothesis of myths excludes. If we style at the plant life cited in the grade, we see that Frye concentrates much of his password on the classics of westerly writings (Shakespeare, Chaucer, Milton, T.S. ... ...y in this cite by removing the individual from the interrogatory the immediate apprehension of Who am I? is replaced with the more(prenominal) free and impersonal Where is here(predicate)? but the sceptical of identity is rudimentary to the Canadian imagination, and is peradventure an saw of our identity. In decontextualizing and desocializing literature, Frye denies the Canadian literary identity. closing Northrop Fryes possible action of literary criticism attempts to acknowledge all literature in a structure that totalizes. In doing so, however, identity is excluded the identity of the writer, the reader, and individual works ofliterature is denied in denying these identities, Frye perhaps precludes the identity of literature itself. mention of References use Frye, Northrop (19 ). The scouring Garden. whole kit CitedFrye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism quad Essays. Princeton Princ eton UP, 1957.