Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 8

date ExampleAgency Group 06. (2012, June 1). U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray Lahood applauds Ohio for enacting ban on texting while brainish by. FDCH Regulatory Intelligence Database. Retrieved from http//web.ebscohost.com.terrehaute.libproxy.ivytech.edu.allstate.libproxy.ivytech.edu/ehost/detail?sid=b5787eb8-fbf3-43f6-8076-c13444f3497b%40sessionmgr11&vid=1&hid=21&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3ddb=mth&AN=32W2353416746 The author is anonymous, plainly he/she writes for the FDCH Regulatory Intelligence Database. The source of authority of the writer comes from the credibility of the database. This database is accessible through EBSCOHost, which contains many conceivable articles and reports. The source has the general public as intended readers. The organization seems to have a bingle stance on the issue, although its reports can contain different viewpoints. The news article basically reported the endorse of U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray Lahood for Ohios texting-while- driving ban. ... Hosansky, D. (2012, May 4). Distracted driving Should driver texting and cellular phone lend oneself be banned? CQ Researcher, 22(17), 401-424. Retrieved from http//library.cqpress.com.terrehaute.libproxy.ivytech.edu.allstate.libproxy.ivytech.edu/cqresearcher/getpdf.php?file=cqr20120504C.pdf David Hosansky is a staff writer for CQ Researcher. He is not an expert on automobile safety, although as a journalist who was nominated twice for a Pulitzer Prize, he is a credible source of news information. CQ Researcher has an intended audience of educated readers. It presents detailed analyses of certain topics using respective(a) viewpoints. Hosansky does not offer any personal claim because he wants readers to decide on the merits of banning cellphone use while driving through providing opposing opinions from experts and stakeholders and providing studies and statistics. This writing is described as descriptive and sincere journalism although it is clear from the tone of the writer that he does not support distractions to driving because of the costs to forgiving life and properties. His stance is more objective than other journalists who either oppose or support texting-while-driving bans. The raise is credible, accurate, complete, and relevant because of the diverse opinions and statistics used. I can use this article to support the claims on the negative personal effects of texting-while-driving. Park, A., Salsbury, J., Corbett, K., & Aiello, J. (2013). The effects of text messaging during dual-task driving simulation on cardiovascular and respiratory responses and reaction time. The Ohio ledger of Science, 111 (2-5), 42-44. Retrieved from